Agent Skills and MCP: Building the Lego Blocks of AI Intelligence

Here's the thing about AI agents in 2024: they were brilliant but isolated. Claude could write incredible code, but couldn't access your GitHub repos. GPT-4 could analyze data masterfully, but couldn't connect to your database. Every agent was a genius locked in a room with no tools and no context.

Two innovations changed that in 2025. First, Model Context Protocol (MCP) gave agents a standardized way to connect to external tools and data—the "USB port for AI" we covered in our deep dive on MCP. Second, Agent Skills emerged as a way to package procedural knowledge—teaching agents how to use those tools effectively, not just giving them access.

Now here's where it gets interesting: these two technologies aren't competing. They're converging. MCP provides the tools. Skills provide the expertise. Together, they're creating something unprecedented—AI agents that can compose capabilities like Lego blocks, building increasingly sophisticated behaviors from reusable components.

And the really wild part? Agents can now create their own Skills. Write code that solves a problem, save it as a Skill, and suddenly that solution becomes a reusable capability. The agents are teaching themselves.

Let's talk about what this means for anyone building AI systems in 2025 and beyond.

The Problem: Fragmentation and the Knowledge Gap

Every Agent Was an Island

Before Skills and MCP, building specialized AI agents meant one of two things:

Option 1: Custom training or fine-tuning. Take a base model, train it on domain-specific data, optimize for your use case. Expensive. Time-consuming. And every time you wanted a different specialization, you started over.

Option 2: Massive system prompts. Load up huge context windows with instructions, examples, documentation, and hope the agent figures it out. Works until you hit context limits. Then you're choosing between losing important context and starting fresh conversations.

Both approaches created fragmentation. You'd end up with multiple custom agents, each specialized for different tasks, none able to learn from the others. Want a Python expert? Build one agent. Need a security auditor? Build another. Tax compliance checker? Yet another agent.

Your AI team became a collection of isolated specialists who couldn't share knowledge or compose their capabilities.

The Tool Access Problem

Even when agents had knowledge, they couldn't do anything with it. You'd give an agent perfect instructions for deploying code, and it would write beautiful deployment scripts it couldn't execute. Analysis recommendations it couldn't implement. Database queries it couldn't run.

Tools existed, but every integration was custom. Connect to GitHub? Write custom code. Slack integration? More custom code. Now you want it to work with a different AI platform? Rewrite everything.

We covered this extensively in our MCP article—the N×M problem where N AI platforms times M data sources equals integration hell.

The Expertise Gap

Here's what people miss: giving an agent access to tools isn't enough. You need to teach it how to use those tools effectively.

Think about it this way: You could hand me access to a professional photo editing suite like Adobe Lightroom. I have the tools. But without knowledge of photography principles, color theory, and editing workflows, I'll produce mediocre results. The tools are necessary but not sufficient.

Same with AI agents. An agent with access to a PostgreSQL MCP server can technically run queries. But does it know to use connection pooling? Understand when to use indexes? Know the security implications of different query patterns?

That expertise layer—the how and when and why—is what Skills provide.

Enter Agent Skills: Teaching Agents New Tricks

What Are Agent Skills?

Agent Skills are organized folders of instructions, scripts, and resources that agents can discover, load, and execute. Think of them as installable expertise modules.

The structure is deliberately simple:

weather-skill/
├── SKILL.md          # Main instructions with YAML frontmatter
├── api_client.py     # Reusable code modules
├── examples/         # Example usage patterns
├── tests/            # Quality validation
└── .env              # Configuration (API keys, etc.)

The SKILL.md file contains YAML frontmatter describing the Skill:

---
name: "weather-analysis"
description: "Analyze weather patterns and generate forecasts"
version: "1.0.0"
---

# Weather Analysis Skill

This Skill provides capabilities for weather data analysis...

## How to Use

1. Load weather data using the fetch_weather function
2. Process patterns using analyze_patterns
3. Generate forecasts with create_forecast

## Example

[Detailed examples and best practices...]

The beauty is in what Anthropic calls "progressive disclosure":

At startup, the agent sees just the name and description
When a Skill becomes relevant, it loads the full SKILL.md instructions
Additional files (code, examples) are loaded only as needed

Context efficiency by design.

Why This Works: Progressive Disclosure

Traditional approaches dump everything into context upfront. Here's all our documentation, all our examples, all our code. Now figure out what's relevant.

Skills flip that model. The agent discovers capabilities incrementally:

Stage 1 - Discovery: Browse available Skills by name and short description. Minimal tokens, maximum discoverability.

Stage 2 - Understanding: Load the full SKILL.md for relevant Skills. Get detailed instructions, usage patterns, best practices.

Stage 3 - Execution: Access code files, examples, and resources as needed for implementation.

This maps to how humans actually work. You don't read every manual before starting a job. You skim titles, dive deeper into relevant sections, reference detailed documentation when needed.

The result? Agents can maintain access to hundreds of Skills without consuming massive context, loading only what's relevant for the current task.

Skills as Executable Knowledge

Here's where Skills get powerful: they're not just documentation. They can include executable code that agents run as tools.

A database Skill might include Python scripts for connection management:

# db_skill/connection.py
# /// script
# dependencies = ["psycopg2-binary>=2.9.0"]
# ///

import psycopg2
import os

def create_connection(pool_size=5):
    """Create a connection pool with best practices."""
    return psycopg2.pool.SimpleConnectionPool(
        1, pool_size,
        host=os.getenv('DB_HOST'),
        database=os.getenv('DB_NAME'),
        user=os.getenv('DB_USER'),
        password=os.getenv('DB_PASSWORD'),
        connect_timeout=10,
        options='-c statement_timeout=30000'
    )

def execute_safe_query(conn, query, params=None):
    """Execute query with safety checks."""
    if any(dangerous in query.upper() for dangerous in ['DROP', 'DELETE', 'TRUNCATE']):
        raise ValueError("Destructive operations require explicit approval")

    with conn.cursor() as cursor:
        cursor.execute(query, params)
        return cursor.fetchall()

The agent doesn't just learn about database best practices—it gets working code that implements those practices. And thanks to PEP 723 inline dependencies, the code includes its own dependency declarations, automatically managed by uv run.

Cross-Platform Support

Skills work across the Claude ecosystem:

Claude.ai: Web interface for conversational work
Claude Code: CLI for development workflows
Claude Agent SDK: Programmatic agent control
Claude Developer Platform: Production agent deployments

Write a Skill once, use it everywhere. No platform-specific adaptations needed.

This is the same "write once, use anywhere" principle that made MCP successful, applied to procedural knowledge instead of tool access.

MCP Revisited: The Tool Layer

We've covered MCP extensively in our previous article, but let's revisit the key concepts in the context of Skills integration.

MCP in 60 Seconds

Model Context Protocol is the standardized way for AI agents to access external tools and data. It defines:

Servers: Lightweight programs exposing capabilities (database access, API clients, file systems)
Clients: Protocol handlers that connect to servers (built into Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini)
Transport: How they communicate (STDIO for local, HTTP for remote)
Security: Explicit permissions, user approval, containerization

An MCP server might expose a GitHub integration:

// github-mcp-server
const server = new Server({
  name: "github-server",
  version: "1.0.0"
});

server.setRequestHandler("tools/list", async () => ({
  tools: [
    {
      name: "create_pr",
      description: "Create a GitHub pull request",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          repo: { type: "string" },
          title: { type: "string" },
          body: { type: "string" },
          base: { type: "string" },
          head: { type: "string" }
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}));

The agent sees available tools, understands their parameters, and can call them. MCP handles the protocol mechanics.

The Challenge: Tool Overload

Here's the problem MCP created: as tool counts grow, loading all tool definitions upfront consumes excessive tokens.

Connect to GitHub? 50 tools. Add Jira? Another 25. Slack? 30 more. PostgreSQL? 40 tools. Suddenly you're spending thousands of tokens just describing available tools before the agent does any actual work.

Anthropic's research showed something remarkable: for the Atlassian MCP server (25 tools), simply listing all tool definitions consumed 4,500 tokens. For a workflow using just 3 of those tools, that's 97% wasted context.

The solution? Code execution with MCP.

Code Execution with MCP: The Game Changer

In November 2025, Anthropic announced a major evolution: code execution with MCP. Instead of presenting tools as individual callable functions, present them as code APIs that agents can program against.

How It Works

Traditional MCP approach:

Agent: "I need to analyze GitHub issues"
System: "Here are 50 GitHub tools you can call..."
Agent: *Loads 3,000 tokens of tool definitions*
Agent: *Calls get_issues, get_comments, get_labels individually*
Agent: *Returns massive JSON responses*

Code execution approach:

Agent: "I need to analyze GitHub issues"
System: "Here's a Python API client for GitHub (200 tokens)"
Agent: *Writes script that imports client, filters/transforms data*
Agent: *Returns only relevant processed results*

The agent writes code that calls the MCP tools, rather than calling tools directly. The code runs in a sandboxed environment with access to the MCP server APIs.

The Efficiency Gains

Anthropic's benchmarks on the Atlassian MCP server showed dramatic improvements:

Token reduction: Up to 98.7% fewer tokens for tool discovery and results
Better results: Code can filter, transform, and aggregate before returning data
State persistence: Variables and state maintained across multiple operations
Privacy: Sensitive data can be processed server-side without returning to the model

For a workflow using Confluence search across 3 different queries:

Direct tool calls: 4,500 tokens (tool definitions) + 15,000 tokens (raw results) = 19,500 tokens

Code execution: 200 tokens (API docs) + 1,200 tokens (processed results) = 1,400 tokens

That's 93% reduction while producing more relevant results.

Why This Matters for Skills

Code execution makes Skills dramatically more powerful. A Skill can teach an agent to write code that orchestrates multiple MCP tools together.

Instead of:

"Call the database tool, then call the analysis tool, then call the reporting tool"

Skills can teach:

"Here's how to write a Python script that queries the database, analyzes patterns, and generates reports—all in one execution"

The Skill contains the pattern and best practices. The MCP server provides the tool access. The agent combines them by writing code that implements the pattern using the tools.

The Convergence: Skills + MCP = Composable Intelligence

Here's where it gets really interesting. Skills and MCP aren't separate technologies—they're complementary layers that work together.

The Stack

Think of it as a three-layer architecture:

Layer 1 - Tool Access (MCP): Standardized connections to external systems. Your database, your APIs, your SaaS platforms. This is the "what can I reach?" layer.

Layer 2 - Procedural Knowledge (Skills): Instructions, patterns, and code for how to use those tools effectively. Best practices, common workflows, domain expertise. This is the "how do I use it well?" layer.

Layer 3 - Agent Reasoning (LLM): The language model that understands intent, makes decisions, and orchestrates Skills and MCP tools to accomplish goals. This is the "what should I do?" layer.

Each layer handles what it's best at:

MCP servers are great at providing consistent, secure tool access
Skills are great at encoding reusable expertise and patterns
LLMs are great at understanding intent and adapting to novel situations

Skills That Use MCP

A well-designed Skill might include code that interfaces with MCP servers:

# code-review-skill/reviewer.py
# /// script
# dependencies = ["requests>=2.31.0"]
# ///

# This Skill assumes a GitHub MCP server is available
# It provides the "how" - MCP provides the "what"

def comprehensive_review(pr_number, repo):
    """
    Perform code review using GitHub MCP tools.

    Best practices encoded in this Skill:
    - Check for security vulnerabilities
    - Verify test coverage
    - Analyze code complexity
    - Review commit messages
    - Validate branch protection rules
    """

    # Use MCP tools to gather data
    pr_data = call_mcp_tool("github", "get_pull_request", {
        "repo": repo,
        "pr_number": pr_number
    })

    files_changed = call_mcp_tool("github", "get_pr_files", {
        "repo": repo,
        "pr_number": pr_number
    })

    # Apply domain expertise (the Skill's value-add)
    security_issues = check_security_patterns(files_changed)
    complexity_score = analyze_complexity(files_changed)
    test_coverage = verify_test_coverage(files_changed, pr_data)

    return generate_review_summary(
        security_issues,
        complexity_score,
        test_coverage
    )

The Skill doesn't reinvent GitHub integration—it uses the MCP server. What it does provide is the code review expertise: what to check, how to analyze, what thresholds matter.

Agents Creating Their Own Skills

This is where it gets wild. Agents can persist successful code as new Skills.

Imagine an agent solves a complex problem—maybe analyzing sales data across multiple databases, applying specific business logic, generating executive reports. That solution works. Why throw it away?

With Skills, the agent can:

Save the working code as a new Skill
Add documentation about when and how to use it
Make it discoverable for future tasks

The next time a similar problem appears (or another agent faces the same challenge), that Skill is available. The solution became a reusable capability.

This is fundamentally different from traditional programming. Humans write reusable libraries consciously and deliberately. But agents can generate reusable capabilities as a byproduct of solving problems.

The system learns from itself.

The Emergence of Skill Libraries

As agents create and share Skills, libraries emerge organically:

Domain Skills: Tax compliance patterns, medical coding standards, legal document analysis
Integration Skills: Best practices for specific APIs, data pipeline patterns
Analysis Skills: Statistical methods, data visualization approaches, reporting templates
Development Skills: Code review patterns, testing strategies, deployment workflows

Each Skill encapsulates expertise. Each MCP server provides tools. Agents compose them dynamically based on the task at hand.

It's Lego blocks for intelligence. Small, focused, reusable pieces that combine into sophisticated behaviors.

Real-World Scenarios: What This Enables

Scenario 1: The Self-Improving Development Agent

Initial State: Agent has access to GitHub MCP server and a basic "code review" Skill.

Task: Review pull requests for a Python microservices project.

Evolution:

Agent reviews first PR using basic Skill
Discovers project uses FastAPI framework
Writes code to check FastAPI-specific patterns (dependency injection, async routes, Pydantic validation)
Code works well—agent persists it as "fastapi-review" Skill
Next PR review automatically uses enhanced FastAPI Skill
Discovers project has specific security requirements
Extends Skill to check custom security patterns
Persists updated Skill

Six months later, that agent has accumulated dozens of project-specific Skills. New team members' agents can load those Skills and immediately have access to institutional knowledge.

The agent became better at its job by doing its job.

Scenario 2: The Data Pipeline Specialist

Challenge: Analyze customer data across PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and a REST API, then generate reports.

Without Skills/MCP: Custom integration code for each data source, hard-coded analysis logic, brittle and non-reusable.

With Skills/MCP:

MCP servers provide standardized access to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and the API
"data-extraction" Skill teaches best practices for querying each source
"customer-analysis" Skill provides analysis patterns and business logic
"report-generation" Skill handles formatting and delivery

Agent writes a script that:

# Uses MCP tools through Skills' guidance
from data_extraction import fetch_postgres, fetch_mongo, fetch_api
from customer_analysis import analyze_patterns, segment_customers
from report_generation import create_executive_summary

# Extract data using best practices from Skills
pg_data = fetch_postgres(query="SELECT * FROM customers WHERE active=true")
mongo_data = fetch_mongo(collection="interactions", filters={"date": "last_30_days"})
api_data = fetch_api(endpoint="/customer-metrics")

# Apply analysis patterns from Skill
patterns = analyze_patterns(pg_data, mongo_data, api_data)
segments = segment_customers(patterns)

# Generate report using Skill templates
report = create_executive_summary(segments)

Every component is reusable. The PostgreSQL access pattern works for any database task. The analysis Skill applies to any customer data. The reporting Skill generates any executive summary.

Compose, don't rebuild.

Scenario 3: The Compliance Checker

Challenge: Ensure code changes comply with HIPAA, SOC2, and internal security policies.

The Skill: Contains detailed compliance rules, common violations, remediation patterns.

The MCP Tools: Access to GitHub (code), Jira (security tickets), audit logging systems.

The Agent: Combines the Skill's domain expertise with MCP tools to:

Pull PR changes from GitHub
Scan for HIPAA violations (unencrypted PHI, missing audit logs)
Check SOC2 requirements (access controls, data retention)
Verify internal policies (approved libraries, secure coding patterns)
File Jira tickets for violations
Log compliance checks for audit trail

The Skill is the valuable part—it contains expert knowledge about compliance requirements. The MCP servers are infrastructure—they provide access to systems. The agent orchestrates both to deliver business value.

The Future: Autonomous Capability Evolution

Self-Expanding Capability Trees

Today, humans define Skills and MCP servers. Tomorrow? Agents do it themselves.

An agent working on web scraping might:

Use existing "web-scraping" Skill successfully
Encounter a site with anti-bot protection
Research bypass techniques
Implement working solution
Create "advanced-web-scraping" Skill automatically
Share it with other agents

Capability trees grow organically. Each branch represents specialized knowledge that emerged from solving real problems.

Skill Ecosystems and Marketplaces

Just like MCP has the MCP Registry, Skills will have curated libraries:

Official Skills: Maintained by Anthropic for common patterns
Community Skills: Open-source contributions for domain expertise
Enterprise Skills: Company-specific knowledge and patterns
Commercial Skills: Specialized expertise from vendors

Browse skills by domain (legal, medical, financial), by framework (React, Django, Kubernetes), by platform (AWS, Azure, GCP). Install them like npm packages.

Cross-Agent Knowledge Transfer

Here's the really interesting part: Skills enable knowledge transfer between agents.

Agent A solves a problem and creates a Skill. Agent B, working on a different task, discovers and loads that Skill. Agent B extends it for a new use case. Agent C combines insights from both.

Knowledge compounds. Each agent contributes to a shared expertise pool. The system becomes more capable over time without retraining models.

This is fundamentally different from how we've built AI systems historically. Instead of static models trained on fixed datasets, we get dynamic systems that accumulate operational knowledge.

The Code Execution Multiplier

As code execution with MCP becomes standard, Skills will increasingly teach agents to write code that orchestrates complex workflows:

Instead of Skills saying:

"Use tool A, then tool B, then tool C"

They'll teach:

"Here's a pattern for writing scripts that coordinate tools A, B, and C efficiently"

The Skill becomes a programming pattern library. The agent becomes a programmer. The MCP tools become the standard library.

We're moving from "AI that uses tools" to "AI that writes programs that use tools." That's a meaningful capability jump.

Challenges and Considerations

Quality Control and Skill Validation

Here's the fascinating challenge with agents creating their own Skills: how do you ensure quality when the creators aren't humans? It's like having an automated factory that builds its own tools—you need quality control built into the process itself.

The answer is emerging as a multi-layered approach. Automated testing becomes non-negotiable—every Skill should ship with tests that prove it works. Before an agent persists a new Skill, it runs those tests. If they pass, the Skill gets saved. If they fail, it's back to the drawing board.

But automated tests catch bugs, not design flaws. That's where peer review comes in, except the peers are other agents. When multiple agents successfully use a Skill across different contexts, that's validation. When agents consistently struggle with it, that's a signal to mark it for human review or deprecation.

Version control becomes critical too. Skills should evolve like code—tracked, versioned, and rollback-able. If a Skill update causes problems, revert to the previous version while you investigate. This is infrastructure, not documentation.

And for critical domains—healthcare, finance, security—human oversight isn't optional. An agent creating a tax compliance Skill or a medical diagnosis Skill can't just deploy that automatically. These need human experts to review and approve before they go live.

Security Implications

Skills that execute code create an interesting security surface. You're essentially letting agents install capabilities that will run in production environments. That requires thinking through some uncomfortable scenarios.

Could malicious instructions be embedded in Skill descriptions to manipulate agent behavior? Absolutely. Imagine a Skill that looks legitimate but includes subtle instructions to exfiltrate data or bypass security checks. It's prompt injection, but at the capability level.

Could Skills trick agents into misusing MCP tools? Sure. A Skill might provide patterns that look like best practices but actually perform privilege escalation or access data inappropriately. The agent follows the Skill's instructions, not realizing they're problematic.

The security principles from MCP apply here—sandboxing, explicit permissions, audit logging, least privilege. But Skills add another attack surface. You need to treat Skill installation like installing software: verify sources, audit code, monitor behavior, and maintain the ability to revoke access if something goes wrong.

This doesn't mean Skills are inherently insecure. It means security can't be an afterthought. Design it in from the start.

The Hallucination Risk

When agents generate their own Skills, you face an interesting epistemological problem: how do you prevent hallucinated capabilities from becoming institutionalized knowledge?

An agent might "remember" solving a problem brilliantly, encode that solution as a Skill, and persist it for future use. Except the solution was partially hallucinated—it worked once by luck, or the agent misremembered the success, or the underlying logic is flawed.

Now that faulty Skill is in your library. Other agents discover and use it. The hallucination spreads.

The solution is validation at multiple levels. Test suites verify functional correctness—does the code actually work? Execution monitoring catches anomalies—is this Skill producing weird results? Human review provides common-sense checks—does this approach make sense? And provenance tracking maintains accountability—which agent created this, when, and under what circumstances?

Think of it as a peer review system where the peers are a combination of automated tests, other agents, and human experts. No single layer catches everything, but together they create a reasonably robust validation process.

Organizational Knowledge Management

For enterprises, agent-generated Skills represent something new and potentially valuable: institutional knowledge that accumulates automatically. But that creates governance challenges that most organizations aren't prepared for.

Imagine you're six months into using agent Skills. You now have hundreds or thousands of them. How does anyone find the right one? Discovery becomes critical. You need search, categorization, tagging, and recommendation systems—basically, you need a knowledge management system for agent capabilities.

Governance questions emerge quickly. Who decides which Skills are official? What's the review process for agent-generated Skills? How do you retire outdated Skills without breaking agents that depend on them? What quality standards must Skills meet? Which agents get access to which Skills?

These aren't technical problems—they're organizational ones. You're essentially managing a codebase that's partially written by non-human contributors. That requires processes, standards, and oversight structures that most companies haven't built yet.

The good news is we've solved similar problems before. Code review processes, library management, dependency tracking, access control—these are known problems with established solutions. They just need adapting to the agent context.

Treat Skills like critical infrastructure. Version control them. Document them. Test them. Review them. Deprecate them thoughtfully. And build the organizational muscles to manage machine-generated knowledge as carefully as you manage human-generated code.

Practical Recommendations

For Organizations Adopting Agent Skills

If you're an organization looking at Skills and wondering where to start, the answer is simpler than you might think: start conservative, then expand.

Begin with curated Skills from Anthropic and other trusted sources. These are battle-tested, well-documented, and safe. Use them to prove value. Show your team what agent Skills enable. Build confidence in the technology before you start letting agents create their own.

Once you're comfortable, define clear boundaries. Which domains can agents create Skills for autonomously? Maybe data analysis and reporting are safe zones. Which domains require human approval? Probably anything touching security, compliance, or customer data. Write these boundaries down. Make them explicit. Your agents will operate within whatever guardrails you establish.

Invest in Skill infrastructure early. This isn't optional—it's foundational. Treat Skills like production code because that's what they are. Version control, code review, testing, documentation standards, the whole nine yards. The time you spend building this infrastructure up front pays dividends when you have hundreds of Skills in production.

Monitor everything. Track which Skills get used most often—those are your high-value capabilities. Track which Skills agents create—that shows you where institutional knowledge is accumulating. Track which Skills solve problems—those are candidates for promotion to official status. This usage data becomes your knowledge graph, showing how expertise flows through your organization.

Finally, create feedback loops. When agents struggle repeatedly with certain tasks, that's a signal you need a Skill for that domain. When agents keep solving the same problem from scratch, that's an opportunity for Skill extraction. Let operational experience drive your Skill library development.

For Developers Building on MCP

If you're building MCP servers, think beyond individual tool calls. Design for Skills integration from the start.

Consider how agents might want to write code that uses your tools. Instead of just exposing individual functions, provide higher-level APIs that support common workflows. Make your server code-friendly, not just call-friendly.

Your documentation matters more than you think. As code execution becomes standard, agents will reference your docs to learn how to use your tools. Include real code examples, not just parameter descriptions. Show common patterns. Demonstrate best practices. This documentation becomes the foundation that Skills build upon.

And embrace composability. Build MCP servers that do one thing exceptionally well rather than trying to be everything to everyone. Let Skills handle orchestration across multiple servers. Your job is to be a reliable, focused tool. Skills will figure out how to compose you with other tools.

For AI Engineers

The skill set for AI engineering is evolving. Prompt engineering was the hot skill in 2023. In 2025, understanding how to write good Skills is equally important.

Learn the Skill format inside and out. Understand what makes a Skill effective versus one that agents struggle with. Study successful Skills. Analyze why they work. This is a new craft, and the people who master it early will have a significant advantage.

Build foundational Skill libraries for your domain. Every industry has common patterns, frequent problems, and established best practices. Encode those as Skills. The more foundational knowledge you capture, the more capable your agents become. This is leverage—one good Skill can improve hundreds of agent interactions.

And contribute to the ecosystem. Open-source your Skills when you can. The Skills that work well for your agents will probably work well for others too. The community that shares knowledge compounds it faster than any individual organization can. Plus, contributing establishes your expertise and brings valuable feedback.

The Convergence Thesis

Here's what Skills + MCP fundamentally change, and why it matters.

Traditional AI agents were static creatures. Every capability had to be designed in advance, trained into the model, or prompted explicitly. An agent couldn't learn from experience in any reusable way. Once a conversation ended, any problem-solving insights vanished. Every agent started from scratch every time.

Skills change that dynamic entirely. Now agents can accumulate capabilities. Each problem solved can become a reusable Skill. Each MCP server added expands the available toolkit. The system compounds knowledge over time instead of forgetting everything between sessions.

Think about what that means for specialization. Previously, building specialized agents meant building separate agents. You'd have your database agent, your security agent, your analysis agent—all separate, all unable to share knowledge. It was fragmented by necessity.

With Skills, specialization happens through composition instead. One agent loads database Skills and becomes your database specialist. Another loads security Skills and becomes your security auditor. A third loads both and becomes your secure database administrator. Same underlying model, different expertise through modular capabilities. They can share Skills, build on each other's knowledge, and compose capabilities dynamically.

And tool integration—historically a mess of custom code, brittle connections, and platform-specific implementations—becomes standardized. MCP provides uniform tool access. Skills teach best practices for using those tools. Agents orchestrate both through code. It's layered, composable, and actually maintainable.

The convergence creates something qualitatively new: agents that expand their own capabilities by encoding successful solutions as reusable patterns. This is closer to how human expertise actually works. We don't retrain our brains for new domains—we learn patterns, build on existing knowledge, and share discoveries with others. Skills bring that same learning dynamic to AI agents.

What This Means for Enterprise AI

For organizations building AI systems, this convergence triggers some strategic shifts worth thinking through carefully.

The competitive advantage isn't in having marginally better base models anymore. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google—they're all converging toward similar capabilities. The real differentiation is in domain-specific Skills that encode your operational knowledge. Your unique workflows, your industry expertise, your hard-won best practices—that's what Skills capture. That's what competitors can't easily replicate.

This means treating agent-generated knowledge as critical infrastructure. Skills that agents create represent institutional knowledge accumulated automatically. That's valuable. Manage it like you manage code—version control, documentation, review processes, the works. Don't let it sprawl organically without governance.

Architectural thinking shifts too. Stop building monolithic agents that try to do everything. Instead, architect for composition. Smaller, focused Skills that combine into sophisticated behaviors. This is microservices thinking applied to agent capabilities—and for similar reasons. Composability, maintainability, reusability.

Create environments where agents can safely experiment, generate Skills, and expand capabilities—but with appropriate oversight and validation. This is controlled autonomy, not wild autonomy. You're not letting agents do whatever they want. You're creating sandboxes where they can learn, bounded by guardrails that ensure safety and quality.

And start building knowledge graphs now. Track which Skills exist, how they relate, when they're used, which agents created them, what problems they solve. That's your map of organizational knowledge. It shows you where expertise is accumulating, where gaps exist, and how knowledge flows through your agent systems.

The future isn't human programmers writing all the code while agents execute it. That's just expensive human-in-the-loop workflow. The future is agents writing code that solves problems, persisting successful solutions as Skills, and building on each other's knowledge—with humans designing the systems that make that safe, effective, and valuable.

Human expertise shifts from "write all the implementation code" to "design the systems, establish the guardrails, and curate the knowledge." That's a different job, requiring different skills. Start building those organizational capabilities now.

The Bottom Line

Agent Skills and MCP are converging into a composable architecture for AI intelligence:

MCP provides standardized, secure access to tools and data
Skills provide reusable patterns and expertise for using those tools
Code execution lets agents write programs that orchestrate both
Persistent Skills let agents turn solutions into reusable capabilities

Together, they move us from isolated, static agents toward ecosystems of composable, evolving intelligence.

The agents aren't just using tools anymore. They're learning patterns, creating reusable capabilities, and building on each other's knowledge.

That's not incremental improvement. That's a fundamental architectural shift.

The question isn't whether this architecture will dominate—the industry momentum is clear. The question is how quickly your organization adopts it, how effectively you build Skills libraries, and whether you're positioned to leverage agent-generated knowledge as a strategic asset.

The Lego blocks of AI intelligence are here. Start building.

Ready to Build Composable AI Agents?

At FMKTech, we help organizations architect AI agent systems that leverage Skills, MCP, and code execution to deliver real business value. We've built production systems using these technologies and understand both their power and their pitfalls.

Whether you're:

Building your first AI agents and want to start with modern architecture
Migrating from legacy agent systems to Skills-based approaches
Creating domain-specific Skill libraries for your organization
Integrating MCP servers with existing infrastructure
Designing governance frameworks for agent-generated knowledge

We can help you navigate the technical and organizational challenges.

Let's talk about your AI agent strategy. Contact us to discuss how Skills and MCP can transform your operations while maintaining security, governance, and quality.

The future of AI is composable. The time to build is now.